Banning of Geeta
Recent news about a Russian court hearing a petition to Ban "Geeta"provoked me to write this post.
In today’s ‘Fast food -
Twitter’ world if one is asked to
interpret Gita it would translate as:
For the
sake of religion (Dharma) you are justified to kill your brothers.
Is it not the same thing that the Islamist (Jihad)
and Christians (Crusade) talk about?
It is not what the holy books talk but
‘Who’ and ‘how’ the words of the holy books are
interpreted, that determines the understanding of Religion.
To understand Mahabharat, Gurcharan Das did not go to
Ayodhya, Mathura, Varansi or Kasi or make the Char Dham yatra, but he went to the institution of Liberal art thinking,
University of Chicago.!!!
Ancient Indian Culture followed the Verbal method of telling
stories / Mythology.
Written works are fairly recent, and there are various
version of Ramayana where the core thoughts remain the same but the body around
it changes. (Valmikis Ramayana, Kamba Ramayana of south , 12th
century; Ramacharitra manas of Tusidas,
16th century.
There was a definitive purpose for the Verbal
tradition.
Ancient Risihi’s had the wisdom to keep the Myths
relevant,
While the stories and values they reflect would remain
the same the context and the interpretation would change with the change of generation,
keeping the best of the old but adding the relevance of the new.
Instead of promoting orthodox one track thinking they
were meant to promote ideas of liberalism, open mindedness and diverse thinking.
Difference of opinion was meant to be celebrated and understood and not condemned
with Banners and Bans.
It will need lot of efforts for the ‘Twitter generation’
to understand that there is a Hell of a difference between ‘Dharma’ and Religion.
If they do make the efforts the world will be a Heaven.
Comments
Post a Comment